Sunday, June 26, 2011

nat wolff 2009

images nat wolff twitter nat wolff 2009. 442 pics of Nat Wolff.
  • 442 pics of Nat Wolff.


  • h1b_forever
    08-13 01:52 PM
    I have heard for short term consulting projects, they are supposed to provide the duration of a project and say, it is for 3 months, h1 gets approved for 3 months

    Next project, get a new h1, so, if you add that up, they can collect 600 Mil




    wallpaper 442 pics of Nat Wolff. nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009.
  • nat wolff 2009.


  • usirit
    01-28 12:16 PM
    We got a denial around Dec-21'07 but after appealing they change back the status to 'In Process'; and according to the timeline we should be no more than 2 weeks away from getting 'CERTIFIED'... Then I-485 and I-140...
    BTW, trs80 what a nice signature....




    nat wolff 2009. How Big Are Wolf
  • How Big Are Wolf


  • Eternal_Hope
    02-27 02:49 PM
    About 25,000 PERM labors were approved in 2007 for Indian nationals. Assuming a 2.5:1 ratio of 'GC filed:Labor approved', implies that each year 62,500 GC are demanded by Indians under EB. Since only 10,000 are available (across all EB classes), this implies each year a backlog of 50,000 cases is created for Indians.

    Since PD are essentially retrogressed from Nov. 2005, we can assume that since then another 100,000 Indians have joined the GC backlog. It can also be assumed that between 2001 and Nov. 2005 there must be another (atleast) 50,000 waiting for GC.

    Assuming these numbers are correct, a person filing for labor today is looking to wait for atleast 15 years before getting a GC (150,000/10,000).

    As for those wth PD prior to Nov. 2005 - well..... probably anywhere between 1 to 5 years .....

    Comments on the analysis.........?




    2011 nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. Nat Wolff And Alex Wolff Visit
  • Nat Wolff And Alex Wolff Visit


  • honge_kamyaab
    11-16 09:11 AM
    Power of internet, thanks for all the input.

    That is right my previous I-94 has expired and I should get the latest I-94 as part of new I-797. My US multiple visa expired last August.

    My question is thoroughly answered that I could use the "Automatic revalidation rule" to come back into US using my I-94 and I-797.

    One more question to the folks who became Canadian PRs. When I exit out
    of US can they force me to give up I-94 as I am landing as Canadian PR. In others words,
    can they override "Automatic revalidation rule" in this case.
    Part of me says they are two different teams one working for US to track I-94
    and the other looking for Canadian PR so they can never rationalize this. If they talk then that could be an issue. Isn't that right?



    more...

    nat wolff 2009. Nat Wolff Actor Nat Wolff
  • Nat Wolff Actor Nat Wolff


  • Pagal
    07-20 08:27 AM
    Hello,

    IMHO, do not sacrifice the career (either yours or your wife's) for the sake of GC .... the amount of money and experience that you stand to lose by not progressing in the career is very difficult to recoup after you get your GC. In this economy, more experience you gather, better will be your chances of securing a higher position and income. I always chose career over GC ... which delayed my GC by about 5 years, but the extra income and experience have more than made up for it ...

    The good news is that you have an approved I-140, so you have a priority date that you can always use irrespective of type of application and/or sponsor (which means, you can file for a new I-140 based on your new job but with the old priority date). Do ask your new employer if they are open to file in EB-2 within one year of your employment based on your performance on the job.

    The fall back option in terms of your wife's career is dicey to count on in this economy, IMHO. Your H1-B is a better fallback option while your GC is pending....just my 2-cents! Good luck! :)




    nat wolff 2009. 2011 Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009.
  • 2011 Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009.


  • amsgc
    04-02 08:47 PM
    I agree, if you have applied for I-485, F1 is not a good idea. I wasn't aware of the OP's GC situation.

    Editing post: It seems that the OP applied for I-140 late last year, and the country of chargeability is India (public profile). So, in this case, F1 is probably a better bet.

    All other points are on the dot!
    Only F1 being better than h4 is really depending on one's situation..
    F1 is Non-Immigrant intent status.. meaning, if you apply for 140, or even have LC applied and USCIS finds out.. you can forget abt getting visa..
    Secondly, F1 has become much restrictive since implementation of SEVIS.
    H4 on the other hand is duel intent

    Major advantages of F1 would be
    1. Possible on-campus 20hr work authorization and later OPT authorization.
    2 Chances of getting assistanceship.

    So it's not black and white..
    and if you've applied for 485.. F1 is really definitely not the way to go..



    more...

    nat wolff 2009. Nat Wolff Pictures
  • Nat Wolff Pictures


  • topgun_gc
    07-12 11:05 AM
    Vivek,

    Can you please share more.? My company also deals with Littler Global, and have not heard such news as of now.



    Our lawyer Company has decided to file the AOS application in July

    I work for a big 5 Software company & our lawyer Littler Global had taken a stand on July that they will not file our AOS application after the June VB was revoked/amended on July 2nd.

    Surprisingly , today we have received a mail from them that that keeping in view our best interest they have decided to file our AOS case in July regardless of CIS receipting them.

    Wanted to share this information as it may be helpful for you folks too ...

    Vivek




    2010 How Big Are Wolf nat wolff 2009. nat wolff twitter
  • nat wolff twitter


  • CantLeaveAmerica
    04-01 11:05 AM
    Here is the answer! Your filing date was July2, 07. If you filed with NSC, in Feb they had moved their processing dates to July 18th. So your case was assigned to officer for review and he called for interview!.

    Then he made a decision: Case approvable pending visa availability!

    Hope that helps!

    Yes, what Vinnysuru said makes sense completely and seems to be the apt explanation for your case. I have a question though if I may ask?
    What did the Immigration officer ask you and what were your answers? Any input from you will be appreciated by all of us if someone here gets an interview call too :)



    more...

    nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. to talk with
  • nat wolff 2009. to talk with


  • santb1975
    02-15 11:45 AM
    After a friendly bump to No.Cal




    hair Nat Wolff And Alex Wolff Visit nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. ashley sykes
  • nat wolff 2009. ashley sykes


  • glus
    08-01 10:18 AM
    My wife's current H4 is valid till Nov. She got her H1 also approved from Oct'2007. She checked the status this morning only on USCIS.

    I'm applying for I-485 and adding her as spouse. Should I file for her advance parole and put her status as H4 in it? What happens to to her H1 approval, if advanced parole gets approved also. Will she loose her H1 status?

    any ideas??

    Put her status as H4. She is in H4 until October 2007 (assuming you asked for change of status and change of status was also approved.) No, she will not loose her H1, as H1 is a "dual intent" visa.



    more...

    nat wolff 2009. dresses Miranda Cosgrove: Nat Wolff#39;s nat wolff 2009. Picture - Nat Wolff
  • dresses Miranda Cosgrove: Nat Wolff#39;s nat wolff 2009. Picture - Nat Wolff


  • sparky_jones
    12-10 01:28 PM
    I recall receiving only 2 copies of AP from TSC. Is that normal?




    hot Nat Wolff Actor Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009. Nat wolff
  • Nat wolff


  • baburob2
    11-02 02:42 PM
    As per my knowledge, GC thru employment is for future job position, i.e. Once your GC is approved you should do the job in that area.

    Plz. correct if I am wrong.

    My company has filed one of my Labor (stuck in DBEC) from MN, while I am working in Texas from Last five years.

    I concur that "GC thru employment is for future job position, i.e. Once your GC is approved you should do the job in that area.". Hence your move is fine.



    more...

    house nat wolff 2009. Picture for Nat Wolff; Picture for Nat Wolff. h1techSlave nat wolff 2009. Alex and Nat Wolff at Planet
  • Alex and Nat Wolff at Planet


  • maxy
    10-15 05:08 PM
    may be not related ... but can someone explain what does this line mean ...

    The letter must also indicate whether the terms and conditions of your employment based visa petition (or labor certification) continue to exist.

    does this mean that while invoking AC21, you have to tell your new employer to support your GC application ? hope not ! whole purpose of using EAD is to get rid of sponsorship non-sense....

    anyone ?




    tattoo 2011 Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. Nat Wolff
  • Nat Wolff


  • logiclife
    03-26 08:20 PM
    Working off the books is illegal ofcourse.

    Because firstly, you are breaking the immigration law by working on H4. Also you are breaking the tax laws by working off the books, since you dont pay taxes and the employer doesnt pay the payroll tax. And no one pays the medicare and social security tax that is supposed to be paid.

    Working without pay:

    A lot of H4s have asked that why cant we work as a volunteer where there is no pay. This might be a grey area and you may want to check with a lawyer before you work on H4 without pay. It could be legal but its really not that black and white.



    more...

    pictures Nat Wolff Pictures nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. Alexandra DiMeco and Nat Wolff
  • nat wolff 2009. Alexandra DiMeco and Nat Wolff


  • jayz
    07-15 01:39 PM
    Congrats!

    How did you get this link? The Chennai website still shows dates for July 2008?



    All,

    Chennai Consulate has released the August appointment schedule on their site.

    http://chennai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/K4oeM-zL_hPooV2orVvylA/ivappoint0808.pdf


    I got an appointment too.. yahoooooooooo...




    dresses Nat wolff nat wolff 2009. nat wolff now. nat wolff 2009.
  • nat wolff now. nat wolff 2009.


  • like_watching_paint_dry
    08-26 11:53 AM
    Dude it is pretty clear you dont belong here. If you joined a body-shop that replaced americans with cheap bodies then your employer violated the law and you were a willing accomplice. You are no better than an illegal alien. No wonder you are so scared of being replaced by yet another cheap body ! IV does not represent people like you.
    Now get the hell out of here.

    :D

    I want dixie as my spokesperson.



    more...

    makeup nat wolff 2009. to talk with nat wolff 2009. nat wolff 2009. Picture for Nat Wolff; Picture for Nat Wolff. h1techSlave
  • nat wolff 2009. Picture for Nat Wolff; Picture for Nat Wolff. h1techSlave


  • aj1234567
    10-04 06:29 PM
    Hi Gurus-
    One of my friends had received strange letter from the consulate saying that

    We are obliged to inform you that petition for temporary employment for xyz InfoTech .has been returned to the department of homeland security(DHS) for reconsideration, in your case you did not meet the necessary criteria of the visa category, we have asked DHS to revoke the petition.

    With this letter we are returning your passport. no additional information or documents are required from you.

    We will contact you once a final decision has been made on your application

    Please advice me why they send this letter and what necessary action we need to take..


    Thanks
    Aj




    girlfriend Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009. Natjun , , allie Nat+wolff+and
  • Natjun , , allie Nat+wolff+and


  • Jeff Wheeler
    11-30 02:31 AM
    and no Jeff, it wasn't directed at you

    Phew! :lol:




    hairstyles dresses Miranda Cosgrove: Nat Wolff#39;s nat wolff 2009. Picture - Nat Wolff nat wolff 2009. -and-nat-wolff-kissing-in-
  • -and-nat-wolff-kissing-in-


  • hopefulgc
    09-02 11:57 AM
    If this is not like a "third world" goverrnment/municipality office, then what is?

    I think we all might just have to form groups of 10 people each and file group WOMs replete with reimbursement of attorney expenses.






    Edit. Latest ..on my case.(with a little history) and this is hilarious.

    8/21/2008 : Talk with the California Service Center (hopefully)
    Me: My case has been transferred all of a sudden to California with the PD became current (on july 21, 2008), why ?
    Answer: Your case has been sent back to TSC on Aug. 15th. We do not have the case any more. You can call TSC to confirm.


    8/22/2008: Talk with Customer Service
    Customer Service: Your case is still in California.

    9/2/2008 : Info pass appointment. Talk with IO
    IO: Your case is still in TSC but will be transferred to CSC soon.

    I cannot believe such an organization exists in the world.
    ************************************************** *********************************




    motown
    08-23 08:08 PM
    Is this category seen as one or is it split into many countries and if so how do you find out about a particular country within ROW?

    Thanks

    Each county has a 7% cap limit.

    Backlog Processing centers reported way back in early 2005 that they have
    ~180,000 cases.If most of the 2001 cases are cleared in the current fiscial year, we should see some movement in the October bulletin for ROW.

    Motown




    gvenkat
    01-07 08:29 PM
    THe Lottery is the dumbest piece to obtain GC. Imagine some guy who does nothing to the USA applies, comes here sucks the $$ out of the system by coming here, staying here and enjoying all monetray benefits of a GC like unemployment benefits etc

    If this passes. THere would be a huge relief among people who have advanced degrees



    No comments:

    Post a Comment